Mercer Cluster

Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide

Youtuber+Logan+Paul+speaks+at+New+York+Comic+Con.+
Youtuber Logan Paul speaks at New York Comic Con.

Youtuber Logan Paul speaks at New York Comic Con.

Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons

Youtuber Logan Paul speaks at New York Comic Con.

Lisa Meskimen, Contributing Writer

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






At the beginning of 2018, the popular YouTuber Logan Paul posted a video blog (vlog) of himself encountering a dead body in Japan’s Aokigahara forest, also known as the Suicide Forest.

Paul, with over 15 million subscribers to his name, is a 22-year-old man whose YouTube channel description reads, “22 year old kid in Hollywood making crazy daily Vlogs!”

The video begins with Paul warning his viewers that it will contain graphic content and assuring them that he won’t make ad revenue off it. As somber piano music plays in the background, he adds “I think this definitely marks a moment in YouTube history because I’m pretty sure this has never hopefully happened to anyone on YouTube ever.”

For many including myself, it became clear early on that Paul meant to hype up his experience and provide entertainment, despite the sad music he edited in.

In the video, Paul and his friends find the body of a man hanging from a tree. Though Paul appears visibly shocked and frazzled, saying “a lot is going through my mind,” he also cracks plenty of jokes and maintains most of the over-the-top behavior that is characteristic of his style.

One major criticism Paul has received for posting the video is that he exploited the suicide to receive views. The tone of the video is an unsettling mismatch of fake seriousness imposed on an event showcased as thrilling.

Though I do believe shock can cause people to react to uncomfortable situations in different ways, sometimes through humor, I don’t believe that Paul would have posted the video if this event truly gave him any discomfort.

It doesn’t appear to have been a sobering experience for him, but rather an opportunity for him to put more exciting content on his channel.

Paul, whose vlog channel has racked up a total of over 3 billion views since he joined YouTube in 2015, faced immediate criticism by fans and non-fans alike.

Not only did Paul receive criticism for his video, but YouTube did as well.

The video violated YouTube’s terms of use, which holds that a graphic video can only remain on the platform so long as it is backed by documentary or educational information. YouTube kept the video on its trending page for roughly 24 hours before Paul took it down himself.

Another nine days passed before YouTube revoked Logan’s Google Preferred Status, which gives the top 5 percent of YouTubers ads from brands that pay for their ads to be put on their channels.

Gestures like these don’t mean much to me when I consider the underlying goal of YouTube. Paul is one of the site’s biggest stars and acts in several YouTube Red, YouTube’s subscription service, originals.

In other words, Paul makes YouTube big money. He could even be seen by some as the face of YouTube. I believe YouTube needed to gauge how negatively it would affect their company to remain inactive before they risked losing an asset.

This particular scandal reminds me that YouTube isn’t the same website as it was five years ago. It’s not just a site where you can make videos for free anymore. Instead, it’s a company like any other, with an agenda and a way of self-promoting.

YouTube places a handful of channels at the top, feeds them money, and keeps them in a particular order that best serves YouTube’s needs. In this case, YouTube’s needs included giving Logan Paul special treatment and tolerating his video as long as it did.

Most people have seen a dead body on the internet before. However, there is a way to portray death so that it remains respectful, and Logan did not care about being respectful nearly as much as he did about getting views.

Similarly, YouTube’s slow reaction shows that they don’t care to take action when it involves threatening their brand. Both YouTube and Paul deserve to be criticized instead of ignoring the problem this controversy caused.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide

    Letters to the Editor

    Opinion: Being sick in college sucks

  • Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide

    Letters to the Editor

    Opinion: Safety for Tattnall Square Center for the Arts

  • Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide

    Letters to the Editor

    Opinion: Jay Sekulow should be allowed to speak at Founder’s Day

  • Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide

    Letters to the Editor

    Opinion: SGA senator speaks out against Sekulow

  • Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide

    Letters to the Editor

    Opinion: The college football system is a broken system

  • Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide

    Letters to the Editor

    Opinion: Is Greek life worth a life?

  • Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide

    Letters to the Editor

    Opinion: What should we do about gun violence?

  • Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide

    Letters to the Editor

    Opinion: “It’s Okay to be White” posters displayed throughout the country

  • Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide

    Letters to the Editor

    Opinion: I studied race and gender in Mercer athletics for my research class, here’s what I found

  • Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide

    Letters to the Editor

    Opinion: Why gender-neutral housing should be available

The student news site of Mercer University
Opinion: YouTube star showcases suicide